The contrast between these two portraits is striking, and instructive: artistic portrayals of René Descartes illustrate the challenges of authentication, and the importance of research. The iconic and oft-reproduced Hals portrait (#1) is now in the reserve collection of the Louvre, on evidence that it is neither by Hals nor of Descartes. The Weenix painting (#2) is doubtless authentic.
Other artistic renderings exist, with a claim to Descartes as their subject. These include both paintings and engravings, both contemporaneous and posthumous, authentic and doubtful, traced and untraced, from an ad vivum sitting to a faithful copy. Among paintings are those by Sébastien Bourdon (1616 – 1671) also in the Louvre, and a portrait with notably contrasting features at the Musee des Augustins in Toulouse, by an unknown hand of the French School. Among engravings are the earliest by Frans van Schooten (the younger, 1615 – 1660), after his own drawing of 1644, and the much different but familiar portrait engraving by Jonas Suyderhoef (1613 – 1686) after Hals of 1649/50. There too the contrasts give scholars and collectors pause. In respect of date, a painting by David Beck (Dutch c. 1621 – 1656), almost certainly the one commissioned by Queen Christina in Sweden and in the possession of their Academy of Sciences, is, if not contemporaneous, contemporaneous-enough (executed soon before, or soon after, Descartes’s death there in February 1650). The authentic Schooten plate evidently yielded early engravings far rarer than those from re-worked states; the line-engravings of Balthasar Moncornet (c. 1600 – 1668) and François Jollain (c. 1641 – 1704) are portraits after Schooten, evidently in single states but less easy to date. Predictably, there are many engravings after Hals – or, as the case would be, after Suyderhoef – ranging widely from rare to common: perhaps the earliest is that of Cornelis van Dalen (the elder, 1602 – 1665).
While the likelihood is low that authentic pictures of René Descartes will surface, it must be emphasized that the art-historical accounting of Descartes portraiture is an incomplete and challenging one. Witness, for example, that the painting owned by abbot Le Monnier, after which Charles Adam commissioned Achille Jacquet’s engraving of Descartes in 1904, has gone untraced following sale upon Le Monnier’s death. And while we know that Descartes’s Haarlem friend Augustin Bloemaert commissioned a portrait of him in 1646, and it remains altogether unclear whether that likeness was rendered by Hals or someone else.
Are you wondering about a portrait in your family collection? It could be a likeness of Descartes. Art Experts Inc. is prepared to help: we welcome and encourage you to contact us. Our team of experts can provide reliable research on any work of art.
Being aware that no definitive iconographic study of René Descartes exists, Art Experts Inc. has commissioned a scholarly review of the subject. We have decided to make it available, for our readers, as an illustration of the professional resources at our disposal, and of the kind of research we can undertake. We hope you find it interesting and informative.
|